| | Table of Contents | | Table of Forms | | Law Journals | | FRCP-Appendix of Forms-LII | | Law Dictionaries |
|
|
FEDERAL COURT |
Law Students | |||||
|
9TH Circuit Court-Case Summaries |
|||||||
|
April 20, 2000 |
|||||||
|
US Codes |
| Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure | | Federal Rules of Evidence | | News |
![]()
U.S. Court of Appeal 9th Circuit
Opinions
Case Summaries-April 20, 2000
9TH Circuit Case Law 4/20/00
[9TH-CASELAW] 4/20/00 Case Law
Date:
Thu, 20 Apr 2000 15:32:34 -0700
U.S. Court of Appeal 9th Circuit Opinions
Case Summaries - April 20, 2000
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
GENTALA v. CITY OF TUCSON (4/20/00 - No. 97-17062)
Where government has created a forum for expressive activities that includes
the provision of financial subsidies or in-kind services, provision of the
subsidies or services to a speaker with a religious perspective will not
violate the Establishment Clause as long as those services are provided to
all speakers in the forum on a religiously neutral basis.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://laws.findlaw.com/9th/9717062.html
GENTALA v CITY OF TUCSON-No. 9717062 - 04/20/00-FCP
GENTALA v THE CITY OF TUCSON-No. 9717062v2 - 03/30/2001-FCP
GENTALA v THE CITY OF TUCSON-No. 9717062v2 - 03/30/2001-FCP
GENTALA v CITY OF TUCSON-No. 9717062p - 01/08/2002-ORDER-FCP
GENTALA v CITY OF TUCSON-No. 9717062p - 01/08/2002-FCP
(OFFICIAL SITE)
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/19465D2FC803308088256B3B0000AEF0/$file/9717062o.PDF?openelement
CRIMINAL LAW
US v. CHON (4/20/00 - No. 98-10469)
Although the military is generally prohibited from participating in civilian
law enforcement activities, military involvement is permitted when there is
an independent military purpose, such as protection of military equipment.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://laws.findlaw.com/9th/9810469.html
CRIMINAL LAW-US v. CHON (4/20/00 - No. 98-10469)
CRIMINAL LAW
US v. JACKSON (4/20/00 - No. 98-17410)
Senator's general denial under oath that he accepted a bribe was lacking in
specificity, causing the court to determine that a new trial would not
produce defendant's acquittal for various crimes relating to the bribery.
In the second development, a former juror in Jackson's trial
made a statement to a defense investigator that suggests that
the juror may have believed at the time of the trial that Jack-
son's co-defendant, or possibly even Jackson, was tampering
with the jury. On appeal we are unable to determine whether,
at the time of Jackson's trial, the juror actually believed that
a telephone threat he received had come from one of the
defendants in the trial. If the juror had believed at the time
that the threat was connected with the trial, that fact would
place a heavy burden on the government to show there was
no prejudice to Jackson. See United States v. Dutkel, 192 F.3d
893, 894 (9th Cir. 1999). "Because even a single partial juror
violates a defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial,"
United States v. Angulo, 4 F.3d 843, 848 (9th Cir. 1993), we
remand to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on this
question.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://laws.findlaw.com/9th/9817410.html
CRIMINAL LAW-US v. JACKSON (4/20/00 - No. 98-17410)-FCP-9th Ct.App.Op.
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
FIRST INTERSTATE v. MURPHY (4/20/00 - No. 98-17420)
Law firm does not owe its client a duty to disclose that it hired the law
clerk of a judge before whom it was appearing in a pending matter, since
judge and law clerk were in the best position to prevent impropriety.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://laws.findlaw.com/9th/9817420.html
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY-FIRST INTERSTATE v. MURPHY (4/20/00 - No. 98-17420)FCP-9th Ct.App.Op.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
US v. VONN (4/20/00 - No. 98-50385)
Mere fact that criminal defendant has been assigned a lawyer for a plea
hearing does not, standing alone, absolve district court judge of
responsibility to advise defendant of his continuing right to an attorney at
trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(3).
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://laws.findlaw.com/9th/9850385.html
USA v VONN-No. 9850385 - 04/20/00FCP-9th Ct.App.Op.
USA v VONN-No. 9850385v2 - 09/14/00FCP-9th Ct.App.Op.
US v. VONN (06/20/02 - No. 98-50385)US v. VONN-ORDER-FCP-9th Ct.App.Op.
USA v. ALPHONSO VONN-No. 9850385pv3 - 06/20/2002-OFFICIAL SITE
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/8B66AB4B734440A288256BDD00768E4F/$file/9850385o.pdf?openelement
The following are direct links to Findlaw resources
http://my.findlaw.com
My FindLaw is a personalization feature that allows lawyers and legal
professionals to create their own My FindLaw homepage. Users can now
customize the vast amount of materials available from FindLaw, including
legal news, federal and state case law, legal job listings, message boards
and other invaluable Web resources, saving them time as they use the
Internet for legal research and business. FindLaw visitors can now easily
create a unique page tailored to meet their information and research needs.
RESEARCH FASTER with My FindLaw--and My FindLaw is for FREE :)
http://my.findlaw.com
FINDLAW US 9TH CIRCUIT CASE SUMMARIES
http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/courts/9th.html
FindLaw Law Library - legal guides, memos and briefs
http://library.findlaw.com
FindLaw Professionals
http://profs.findlaw.com/
FindLaw Lawyer Marketing
http://marketing.findlaw.com/
FindLaw Tech Deals
http://techdeals.findlaw.com
![]()
FEDERAL COURT OPINIONS-Table of Contents
9TH Circuit Court-Case
Summaries
U.S. Court of Appeal 9th Circuit OpinionsCase
Summaries-Main Page
[ 9th Circuit Case Law-FindLaw ]
http://findlaw.com/casecode/courts/9th.html
[ 9th Circuit Case Law-Official Court Site-Ninth Circuit Office of the Circuit
Executive
http://www.ce9.uscourts.gov
[9th Circuit Case Law-Official Court Site9th Circuit Court ofAppeals Website
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/opinions+by+date?OpenView&Start=1&Count=100&Expand=1.1#1.1
_________________________
Have a BEAUTIFUL DAY!!!!!
U.S. Court of Appeal 9th Circuit Opinions
Case Summaries - April 20, 2000-FCP-9th Ct.App.Op.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW_GENTALA v. CITY OF TUCSON (4/20/00 - No. 97-17062)