|
|
FEDERAL COURT OPINIONS |
||||||
| 9TH Circuit Court-Case Summaries | |||||||
|
5-15-02 |
|
Journals |
| Federal Civil Procedure |
U.S. Court of Appeal 9th Circuit
Opinions
Case Summaries-May 15, 2000
9TH Circuit Case Law 5/15/02
Date: Thursday, 16 May 2002 01:02:08 -0700
========================================================================
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, CIVIL PROCEDURE, ERISA, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW
* FUNKHOUSER v. WELLS FARGO BANK
ATTORNEY'S FEES, CIVIL PROCEDURE, CLASS ACTIONS, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW
* VIZCAINO v. MICROSOFT CORP.
CIVIL RIGHTS, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE
* US v. HERMANEK
========================================================================
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, CIVIL PROCEDURE, ERISA, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW
FUNKHOUSER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, No. 00-35397, 00-35410
(9th Cir. May
15, 2002)
A federal court had jurisdiction to rule that ERISA completely
pre-empted a state law claim, even when the court ultimately
declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction after appellants
failed to state a federal claim under the Family Leave Medical Act.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
[PDF File]
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0035397p.pdf
ATTORNEY'S FEES, CIVIL PROCEDURE, CLASS ACTIONS, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW
VIZCAINO v. MICROSOFT CORP., No. 01-35494 (9th Cir. May
15, 2002)
No abuse of discretion in awarding attorney's fees of 28% of a
settlement fund to class counsel, in an action between defendant and
its freelance workers, where court applied the lodestar
method as a
cross check of the percentage method in its calculation.
Editor-This case
(VIZCAINO
v. MICROSOFT CORP., No. 01-35494 (9th Cir. May 15, 2002)
has an appendix of sample awards.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to (FCP):
VIZCAINO v. MICROSOFT CORP., No. 01-35494 (9th Cir. May 15, 2002)
To read the full text of this opinion, go to: (Findlaw)
[PDF File]
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0135494p.pdf
CIVIL RIGHTS, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE
US v. HERMANEK, No. 99-10092, 99-10137, 99-10142,
99-10197,
99-10143, 99-10146 (9th Cir. May 15, 2002)
Government's failure to comply with recording and sealing
requirements, in wiretaps of cell phone and pager communications,
did not mandate suppression where non-compliance was adequately
explained; portions of expert testimony should be excluded where the
expert's interpretations of particular code words were not supported
by reliable methods.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
[PDF File]
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/9910092p.pdf
![]()
FEDERAL COURT OPINIONS-Table of Contents
9TH Circuit Court-Case
Summaries
U.S. Court of Appeal 9th Circuit OpinionsCase
Summaries-Main Page
Click here to browse or search the archive for specific opinions at findlaw:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casesummary/index.html
FREE CLASS ACTION AND PRODUCT RECALL INFORMATION ON FINDLAW
In FindLaw's Class Action and Mass Tort Center you can read the latest
class action news and research recall and safety resources from federal
agencies including the US Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Visit
http://classaction.findlaw.com
ONLINE CLE FROM ARTHUR MILLER NOW AVAILABLE! West LegalEdcenter and the
National Practice Institute present Miller’s Insights: 2002 Federal Civil
Judicial Procedure and Rules. Professor Miller reviews the 2001 effective
changes, discusses Supreme Court cases of considerable potential
importance and analyzes proposed changes to the 2002 rules.
http://rd.findlaw.com/scripts/nl.pl?url=9th_cle_1017769975
Get FREE ground shipping in the U.S. on all West Group orders.
http://rd.findlaw.com/scripts/nl.pl?url=9th_book_1020298694
AbacusLaw. Over 100,001 users can't possibly be
wrong! See for yourself. For the latest color brochure and demo, call
toll-free 800-726-3339 or click here.
http://rd.findlaw.com/scripts/nl.pl?url=10173888005_nl
FINDLAW DAILY OPINION SUMMARIES - May 15, 2002
U.S. 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/courts/9th.html
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
_________________________
Have a BEAUTIFUL DAY!!!!!
Copyright 2000